Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Morris Cochran v. Veterans Administration Bureau of Prisons, 94-7290 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7290 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 20, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 50 F.3d 5 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Morris COCHRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-7290. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 16, 1995 Decided: March 20, 1995 Robert
More

50 F.3d 5

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Morris COCHRAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7290.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995
Decided: March 20, 1995

Robert Morris Cochran, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint alleging various constitutional and civil rights violations. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cochran v. Veterans Admin., No. CA-93-685-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and his "Motion for Additional Damages due to Fraud and False Statements." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer