Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Craig Sanders Boone v. Travis Outlaw William Hendrix Talmadge L. Barnett William A. Dudley, 94-7209 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7209 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 17, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 50 F.3d 5 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Craig Sanders BOONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Travis OUTLAW; William Hendrix; Talmadge L. Barnett; William A. Dudley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-7209. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: January 19, 1995 Decid
More

50 F.3d 5

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Craig Sanders BOONE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Travis OUTLAW; William Hendrix; Talmadge L. Barnett;
William A. Dudley, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7209.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 19, 1995
Decided: February 17, 1995

Craig Sanders Boone, Appellant Pro Se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, LaVee Hamer Jackson, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boone v. Outlaw, No. CA-92-143 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer