Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

George Edward Fitzgerald v. David L. Smith Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 94-7417 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7417 Visitors: 39
Filed: Feb. 22, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 50 F.3d 6 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. George Edward FITZGERALD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David L. SMITH; Attorney General of The Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-7417. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Feb. 22, 1995. Submitted Jan. 19
More

50 F.3d 6

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Edward FITZGERALD, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
David L. SMITH; Attorney General of The Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7417.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 1995.
Submitted Jan. 19, 1995
Decided Feb. 22, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-441-R)

George Edward Fitzgerald, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, VA, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fitzgerald v. Smith, No. CA-94-441-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer