Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David Chapman v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, 95-6122 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6122 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 11, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 265 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. David CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parker EVATT, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-6122. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 15, 1995. Decided A
More

51 F.3d 265

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department
of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-6122.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 11, 1995.

David Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. George C. James, Sr., RICHARDSON, JAMES & PLAYER, Sumter, SC, for appellee.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chapman v. Evatt, No. CA-94-203 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED..

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer