Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steven M. Johnson v. Captain Burkehart, Co v. Warden Beshears M. Bradshaw, Mailroom Supervisor, 95-6044 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6044 Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 11, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 266 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain BURKEHART, CO V; Warden Beshears; M. Bradshaw, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6044. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 15, 1995. De
More

51 F.3d 266

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Captain BURKEHART, CO V; Warden Beshears; M. Bradshaw,
Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6044.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 11, 1995.

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Burkehart, No. CA-94-2524-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED..

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer