Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ricky A. Pierce v. Roderick Kearney, Correctional Officer Eugene Warwick, Sergeant North Carolina Department of Corrections, 94-7102 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7102 Visitors: 36
Filed: Apr. 03, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 267 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ricky A. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roderick KEARNEY, Correctional Officer; Eugene Warwick, Sergeant; North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-7102. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
More

51 F.3d 267

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ricky A. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roderick KEARNEY, Correctional Officer; Eugene Warwick,
Sergeant; North Carolina Department of
Corrections, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7102.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 3, 1995.

Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. LaVee Hamer, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Kearney, No. CA-93-113-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 1993 and Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer