Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stevie Locklear v. Randy Lee, 94-6687 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6687 Visitors: 30
Filed: Apr. 18, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 52 F.3d 321 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Stevie LOCKLEAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Randy LEE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-6687. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 28, 1995 Decided: April 18, 1995 Appeal from the United States District Court f
More

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stevie LOCKLEAR, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Randy LEE, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 94-6687.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-65)

Stevie Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Locklear v. Lee, No. CA-94-65 (E.D.N.C. June 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer