Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James Tinsley, A/K/A Virgel St. John v. Richard S. Lindler, Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution, 95-6382 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6382 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 27, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 59 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James TINSLEY, a/k/a Virgel St. John, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard S. LINDLER, Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-6382. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May 18, 1995.
More

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James TINSLEY, a/k/a Virgel St. John, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard S. LINDLER, Warden, McCormick Correctional
Institution, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-6382.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

James Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to strike, rehear, or appeal from the court's earlier order dismissing without prejudice his request for habeas relief based on Appellant's failure to exhaust his state remedies. Because we recently affirmed the district court's prior order in Tinsley v. Lindler, No. 95-6121 (4th Cir. Apr. 11, 1995) (unpublished), we affirm the court's decision to deny Appellant's motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer