Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

95-6511 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6511 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 29, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 822 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard A. LANHAM, in his individual and official capacities; Thomas Corcoran, Warden of Brockbridge Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellees. Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rich
More

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM, in his individual and official
capacities; Thomas Corcoran, Warden of
Brockbridge Correctional Facility,
Defendants-Appellees.
Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM, in his individual and official
capacities; Thomas Corcoran, Warden of
Brockbridge Correctional Facility,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-6511, 95-6534.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 29, 1995.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

In No. 95-6534, Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holsey v. Lanham, No. CA-94-1629-K (Mar. 6, 1995, Apr. 10, 1995). In No. 95-6511, Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on the same complaint that was before us in No. 95-6534. As we have already ruled that the district court did not err in its decision, we dismiss No. 95-6511 as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer