Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-1145 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1145 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 10, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 822 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 95-5735 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wilbur P. HOLLAR; Ruth Carol Hollar, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. J.R. STARKY; Hugh M. Parker; Sullivan Young; Harry L. Martin; Cecil Anderson; John Doe, 1 to 100 individuals claiming to be I.R.S. Agen
More

60 F.3d 822

76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 95-5735

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wilbur P. HOLLAR; Ruth Carol Hollar, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
J.R. STARKY; Hugh M. Parker; Sullivan Young; Harry L.
Martin; Cecil Anderson; John Doe, 1 to 100
individuals claiming to be I.R.S.
Agents, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1145.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 10, 1995.

Wilbur P. Hollar, Ruth Carol Hollar, appellants pro se. Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Robert William Metzler, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing their civil action in which they sought a declaratory judgment that tax liens and levies were imposed in violation of their civil rights. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hollar v. Starky, No. CA-92-754-6 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer