Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

James Calvin Rothwell v. State of North Carolina Attorney General of North Carolina, 95-6338 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6338 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 11, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 824 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James Calvin ROTHWELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of North Carolina; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-6338. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 20, 1995. Decided
More

60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Calvin ROTHWELL, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina; Attorney General of North
Carolina, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-6338.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 1995.
Decided: July 11, 1995.

James Calvin Rothwell, appellant pro se. Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rothwell v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-102-3 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer