Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Earl Vonney Wade v. Lonnie Saunders, Warden Edward D. Carey, M.D. Pamela Ingram, R.N. Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional Officer, 7262 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 7262 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 06, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 826 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Earl Vonney WADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lonnie SAUNDERS, Warden; Edward D. Carey, M.D.; Pamela Ingram, R.N.; Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94 7262. United States Court of Appeals, Four
More

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Earl Vonney WADE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS, Warden; Edward D. Carey, M.D.; Pamela
Ingram, R.N.; Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional
Officer, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94 7262.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 11, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.

Earl Vonney Wade, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Colin James Steuart Thomas, Jr., Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wade v. Saunders, No. CA-93-194 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer