Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Paul M. Omar, 95-6687 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6687 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 18, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 901 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul M. OMAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-6687. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 22, 1995 Decided: July 18, 1995 Paul M. Omar, Appellant Pro Se. S
More

61 F.3d 901

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Paul M. OMAR, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6687.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995
Decided: July 18, 1995

Paul M. Omar, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephen Urban Baer, Charlottesville, VA, for Appellee.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Omar, Nos. CR-92-99; CA-94-681-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer