Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roger Dale Grubb v. Richard Frye, Sheriff Wayne Coble, Sergeant Central Prison Hospital Alamance County Jail Skip Hayes, Deputy, Alamance County Jail, 95-6390 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6390 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 10, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 62 F.3d 1414 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Roger Dale GRUBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard FRYE, Sheriff; Wayne Coble, Sergeant; Central Prison Hospital; Alamance County Jail; Skip Hayes, Deputy, Alamance County Jail, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6390. United States
More

62 F.3d 1414

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger Dale GRUBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard FRYE, Sheriff; Wayne Coble, Sergeant; Central
Prison Hospital; Alamance County Jail; Skip
Hayes, Deputy, Alamance County Jail,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6390.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 10, 1995.

Roger Dale Grubb, appellant pro se. S.C. Kitchen, Assistant County Attorney, Graham, NC; Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, NC; David A. Irvin, James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, NC, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grubb v. Frye, No. CA-92-297-2 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 1994). We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer