Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony Atkins v. Jack Lee, "Awo" T. Martin, Hearing Officer Brenda Brereton, Counselor, and Fitzgerald, Correctional Officer, 95-6921 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6921 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 22, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 64 F.3d 655 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack LEE, "Awo"; T. Martin, Hearing Officer; Brenda Brereton, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees, and Fitzgerald, Correctional Officer, Defendant. No. 95-6921. United States Court of Appeal
More

64 F.3d 655

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Jack LEE, "Awo"; T. Martin, Hearing Officer; Brenda
Brereton, Counselor, Defendants--Appellees,
and
Fitzgerald, Correctional Officer, Defendant.

No. 95-6921.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 1995.
Decided: August 22, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Lee, No. CAn-94-779-R (W.D.Va. May 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer