Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vincent Edward Little v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 95-6631 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6631 Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 17, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 64 F.3d 658 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Vincent Edward LITTLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-6631. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Aug. 17, 1995. Vince
More

64 F.3d 658

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Vincent Edward LITTLE, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-6631.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1995.

Vincent Edward Little, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Little v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-328-2-1-AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer