Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nile Nelson Stone v. Pamela Holocomb, Nurse, 95-7227 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7227 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 26, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 69 F.3d 533 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Nile Nelson STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pamela HOLOCOMB, Nurse, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-7227. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 12, 1995. Decided: October 26, 1995. Nile Nelson Stone, App
More

69 F.3d 533

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nile Nelson STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Pamela HOLOCOMB, Nurse, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7227.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 12, 1995.
Decided: October 26, 1995.

Nile Nelson Stone, Appellant Pro Se. William Carrington Thompson, Chatham, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to the Appellee and ordering the Appellant to particularize his complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer