Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. James Peter Sullivan, A/K/A Dude, 95-7010 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7010 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 31, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 69 F.3d 534 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Peter SULLIVAN, a/k/a Dude, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-7010. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1995. Decided Oct. 31, 1995. Appeal from t
More

69 F.3d 534

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Peter SULLIVAN, a/k/a Dude, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7010.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1995.
Decided Oct. 31, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-53-F, CA-95-434-5-F)

James Peter Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sullivan, Nos. CR-92-53-F; CA-95-434-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer