Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael Lee Grandy v. Virginia Parole Board, 95-7163 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7163 Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 16, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 70 F.3d 111 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael Lee GRANDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-7163. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 12, 1995. Decided Nov. 16, 1995. Appeal from the United States
More

70 F.3d 111

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Lee GRANDY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7163.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 12, 1995.
Decided Nov. 16, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-106)

Michael Lee Grandy, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grandy v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-95-106 (E.D.Va. July 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process and deny the motion to appoint counsel.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer