Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Larry Yancey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 95-2254 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2254 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 04, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 70 F.3d 1265 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Larry YANCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-2254. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Dec. 4, 1995. Larry Yancey, Appel
More

70 F.3d 1265

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry YANCEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-2254.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 4, 1995.

Larry Yancey, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing his action in which he challenged Supplemental Security Income payments because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 405(g) and (h) (West Supp.1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yancey v. Secretary of HHS, No. CA-93-540-1 (M.D.N.C. June 6, 1995). We deny the motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer