Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alvin Dotson v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 95-2701 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2701 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 15, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 72 F.3d 126 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Alvin DOTSON, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 95-2701. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted
More

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alvin DOTSON, Petitioner,
v.
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 95-2701.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1995.
Decided Dec. 15, 1995.

Alvin Dotson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Karen Nancy Blank, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-1196-BLA)

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Dotson v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 95-1196-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer