Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Guy Everette Boyd, III v. Lynn Phillips, 95-7512 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7512 Visitors: 56
Filed: Dec. 12, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 72 F.3d 126 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Guy Everette BOYD, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lynn PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-7512. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Dec. 12, 1995. Appeal from the United States Dist
More

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Guy Everette BOYD, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lynn PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7512.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-804-5-BO).

Guy Everette Boyd, III, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Phillips, No. CA-94-804-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer