Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

William C. Lucion v. Doctor Berdeen Lieutenant Brooks Sheriff Hudson D.W. Barnes v. May Doctor Tien P. Hines, Lpn, and Medics R.K. Miller, Medic, 95-7105 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7105 Visitors: 48
Filed: Dec. 12, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 72 F.3d 127 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William C. LUCION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor BERDEEN; Lieutenant Brooks; Sheriff Hudson; D.W. Barnes; V. May; Doctor Tien; P. Hines, LPN, Defendants-Appellees, and Medics; R.K. Miller, Medic, Defendants. No. 95-7105. Unit
More

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William C. LUCION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor BERDEEN; Lieutenant Brooks; Sheriff Hudson; D.W.
Barnes; V. May; Doctor Tien; P. Hines, LPN,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
Medics; R.K. Miller, Medic, Defendants.

No. 95-7105.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

William C. Lucion, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Scott Blair, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Lucion v. Berdeen, No. CA-94-184-R (W.D.Va. June 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer