Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael C. Antonelli v. Eduardo Gonzalez, Director, United States Marshals Service, 95-7068 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7068 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 21, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 73 F.3d 356 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael C. ANTONELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eduardo GONZALEZ, Director, United States Marshals Service, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-7068. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 16, 1995. Decided:
More

73 F.3d 356
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael C. ANTONELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Eduardo GONZALEZ, Director, United States Marshals Service,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7068.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.

Michael C. Antonelli, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for mandamus relief. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We also deny as moot Appellant's motion for release on bond pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer