Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-7276 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7276 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 21, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 73 F.3d 356 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kevin BATTLE; Joseph Hankins; Winston Lloyd; Gordon Yautis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Kevin JOHNSON; David Campbell; Randall Simmons; Daniel Davis; Russell Adams; Jesse Seymour, Plaintiffs, v. Richard LANHAM, Commissioner of
More

73 F.3d 356
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin BATTLE; Joseph Hankins; Winston Lloyd; Gordon
Yautis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Kevin JOHNSON; David Campbell; Randall Simmons; Daniel
Davis; Russell Adams; Jesse Seymour, Plaintiffs,
v.
Richard LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; Earl Beshears,
Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; George
Kalaroumakis, Eastern Correctional Institution Annex;
Captain Worthy, Eastern Correctional Institution Annex;
Lieutenant Flaig; Lieutenant Henderson; Chief of Security,
Eastern Correctional Institution Maximum, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7276.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 12, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.

Kevin Battle, Joseph Hankins, Winston Lloyd, Gordon Yautis, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Lanham, No. CA-94-258-B (D.Md. July 26, 1995). Additionally, we deny Appellant Winston Lloyd's motion to consolidate all the Appellants' notices of appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer