Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arlin Murphy v. Jumacris Mining, Incorporated Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 95-2062 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2062 Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 26, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 73 F.3d 358 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Arlin MURPHY, Petitioner, v. JUMACRIS MINING, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 95-2062. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Dec.
More

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arlin MURPHY, Petitioner,
v.
JUMACRIS MINING, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 95-2062.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1995.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 26, 1995.

Arlin Murphy, Petitioner Pro Se. George Lawson Partain, Logan, West Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Jennifer U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits* pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Murphy v. Jumacris Coal Co., No. 89-3073-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant's claim was for medical benefits only

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer