Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

95-6719 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6719 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 04, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 73 F.3d 360 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Herman D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.P. ROGERS, Regional Administrator; D.R. Guillory, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center; L. Jarvis, Assistant Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center; C. Lewis, Major, Chief of Security,
More

73 F.3d 360
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Herman D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.P. ROGERS, Regional Administrator; D.R. Guillory, Warden,
Powhatan Correctional Center; L. Jarvis, Assistant Warden,
Powhatan Correctional Center; C. Lewis, Major, Chief of
Security, Powhatan Correctional Center; LIEUTENANT J.R.
TOWNSEND; S. Morton, Sergeant; W.T. Couto, c/o; Sutton,
c/o; Chavious, c/o; Pennington, c/o, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6719.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Herman D. Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Rogers, No. CA-94-779-CV-3 (E.D.Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer