Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Benjamin M. Venning v. Defense General Supply Center, and Virginia Employment Commission, 95-2567 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2567 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 15, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 77 F.3d 472 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Benjamin M. VENNING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER, Defendant-Appellee, and VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, Defendant. No. 95-2567. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 199
More

77 F.3d 472

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Benjamin M. VENNING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER, Defendant-Appellee,
and
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, Defendant.

No. 95-2567.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 15, 1996.

Benjamin M. Venning, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order entering judgment as a matter of law in favor of Defendant in this action in which Appellant sought judicial review of the decisions denying relief in his employee grievance. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Venning v. Defense General Supply Center, No. CA-94-772-3 (E.D.Va. July 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer