Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Lee Brock v. Warden, Indian Creek Correctional Center, 95-7827 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7827 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 28, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 78 F.3d 578 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Lee BROCK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-7827. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 28, 1996. Appeal from
More

78 F.3d 578

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Lee BROCK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-7827.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 28, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1076-R)

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Warden, No. CA-95-1076-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer