Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Darnell Jones v. John Taylor Assistant Warden Ponton Sergeant Terry, 95-7821 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7821 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 28, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 78 F.3d 579 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Darnell JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John TAYLOR; Assistant Warden Ponton; Sergeant Terry, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-7821. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 28, 1996. App
More

78 F.3d 579

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Darnell JONES, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
John TAYLOR; Assistant Warden Ponton; Sergeant Terry,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7821.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 28, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-886-R)

Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Taylor, No. CA-94-886-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer