Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Derek Jackson, A/K/A James A. Jackson, A/K/A Sa'id Abdus-Samad v. Sewall Smith Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 95-7043 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7043 Visitors: 104
Filed: Apr. 02, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 81 F.3d 150 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Derek JACKSON, a/k/a James A. Jackson, a/k/a Sa'id Abdus-Samad, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sewall SMITH; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-7043. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circu
More

81 F.3d 150

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Derek JACKSON, a/k/a James A. Jackson, a/k/a Sa'id
Abdus-Samad, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-7043.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: April 2, 1996.

Derek Jackson, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Smith, No. CA-94-114-HAR (D. Md. June 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer