Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-7645 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7645 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 28, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 81 F.3d 150 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William J. NEAL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aaron JOHNSON; Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and Joseph Hamilton; Lynn Phillips; Gary Dixon; H.B. Byad; D. Foster; William A. Dudley; Charles K. Craven, Jr.; John
More

81 F.3d 150

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William J. NEAL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Aaron JOHNSON; Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., Defendants-Appellees,
and
Joseph Hamilton; Lynn Phillips; Gary Dixon; H.B. Byad;
D. Foster; William A. Dudley; Charles K. Craven,
Jr.; John Doe, # 1; John Doe, # 2, Defendants.

No. 95-7645.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 29, 1996.
Decided March 28, 1996.

William J. Neal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Neal v. Johnson, No. CA-93-563-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer