Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-7989 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7989 Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 12, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 82 F.3d 410 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Richard Dean MEARS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Department of the Army, Fort Lee Army Base; United States Department of Labor; Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-7989. United St
More

82 F.3d 410

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Dean MEARS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Department of the Army, Fort Lee
Army Base; United States Department of Labor;
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7989.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 12, 1996.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1504-AM).

Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his suit filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mears v. United States, No. CA-95-1504-AM (E.D.Va. Oct. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer