Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lou Ellen Summers v. Jeff Sturgill Don E. Earls Wise County Sheriff's Department M.E. Muir, Deputy Sheriff of Wise County, 96-6200 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6200 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 03, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 83 F.3d 416 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lou Ellen SUMMERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeff STURGILL; Don E. Earls; Wise County Sheriff's Department; M.E. Muir, Deputy Sheriff of Wise County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-6200. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circ
More

83 F.3d 416

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lou Ellen SUMMERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Jeff STURGILL; Don E. Earls; Wise County Sheriff's
Department; M.E. Muir, Deputy Sheriff of Wise
County, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6200.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 3, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-137-B)

Lou Ellen Summers, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Sturgill, Wise, Virginia; Don E. Earls, Norton, Virginia; James Rutledge Henderson, IV, HENDERSON & DE COURCY, P.C., Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Summers v. Sturgill, No. CA-95-137-B (W.D.Va. Jan. 22, 1996). Additionally, we deny the Appellees' motions to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer