Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Owen Franklin Silvious, 96-6251 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6251 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 03, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 83 F.3d 417 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Owen Franklin SILVIOUS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-6251. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 15, 1996. Decided May 3, 1996. Appeal from the United S
More

83 F.3d 417

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Owen Franklin SILVIOUS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6251.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 3, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-86-80-R)

Owen Franklin Silvious, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence under former Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) (applicable to offenses committed before November 1, 1987). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Silvious, No. CR-86-80-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer