Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Joseph Ammirati Roseann Marie Ammirati v. Nellie Mae Incorporated the Educational Resource Institute, 95-2967 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-2967 Visitors: 26
Filed: May 10, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 615 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Joseph AMMIRATI; Roseann Marie Ammirati, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NELLIE MAE INCORPORATED; THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE INSTITUTE, Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-2967. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitte
More

85 F.3d 615

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Joseph AMMIRATI; Roseann Marie Ammirati, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
NELLIE MAE INCORPORATED; THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE
INSTITUTE, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 95-2967.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 9, 1996.
Decided: May 10, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-337-4-22, BK-94-72609)

John Robert Lester, THE LESTER LAW FIRM, Columbia, SC, for Appellants. Robert Joseph Ammirati, Roseann Marie Ammirati, Appellees Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order that a portion of the education loans owed by Robert Ammirati is dischargeable in bankruptcy. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ammirati v. Nellie Mae Inc., Nos. CA-95-337-4-22; BK-94-72609 (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer