Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alonzo Kevin Birchead v. Earl Breshears, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 96-6148 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6148 Visitors: 53
Filed: May 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 615 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Alonzo Kevin BIRCHEAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Earl BRESHEARS, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-6148. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 16, 1996. D
More

85 F.3d 615

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alonzo Kevin BIRCHEAD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Earl BRESHEARS, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-6148.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 1996.
Decided May 7, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CA-95-1063-L)

Alonzo Kevin Birchead, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. We also find that even if a part of Appellant's insufficient evidence claim is not procedurally defaulted it is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Birchead v. Breshears, No. CA-95-1063-L (D.Md. Jan. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer