Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Joseph J. Pavlico v. United States, 95-8520 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-8520 Visitors: 22
Filed: May 02, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 616 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph J. PAVLICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-8520. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 15, 1996. Decided: May 2, 1996. Appeal from the United Stat
More

85 F.3d 616

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph J. PAVLICO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-8520.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: May 2, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-87-60, CA-95-308-P).

Joseph J. Pavlico, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pavlico v. United States, Nos. CR-87-60; CA-95-308-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer