Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re Michael Wayne Montgomery, A/K/A Shaka MacUmba Zulu X, in Re Michael Wayne Montgomery, A/K/A Shaka MacUmba Zulu X, 96-6231 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6231 Visitors: 41
Filed: May 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 616 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In re Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. In re Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant. Nos. 95-7269, 96-6231. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Apr
More

85 F.3d 616

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X,
Appellant.
In re Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant.

Nos. 95-7269, 96-6231.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 1996
Decided May 7, 1996

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (MISC-95-136)

Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders imposing and implementing a prefiling injunction against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Michael Wayne Montgomery, No. MISC-95-136 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 1995 & Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer