Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

96-6236 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6236 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 616 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frank JOHNSON, a Former Undercover Agent of the State Attorney's Office of Allegheny County, Maryland, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N.T.F. Trooper KECKLER, Individually and Official Capacity, State Police Officer/Barrack-B; N.T.F.
More

85 F.3d 616

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank JOHNSON, a Former Undercover Agent of the State
Attorney's Office of Allegheny County, Maryland,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
N.T.F. Trooper KECKLER, Individually and Official Capacity,
State Police Officer/Barrack-B; N.T.F. Trooper Updegraffee,
Individually and Official Capacity, State Police/Barrack-B;
Barry Levine, Individually and Official Capacity as a State
Attorney for the State Attorney Office of Allegheny County,
Maryland; Kenneth Long, Jr., Individually and Official
Capacity as a State Attorney for Washington County,
Maryland; office Of the State Attorney for Washington
County, Maryland; Office of The State Attorney for
Allegheny County, Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6236.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 7, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-95-274-CCB)

Frank Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Betty Stemley Sconion, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Keckler, No. CA-95-274-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer