Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Merrill E. Fields v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 95-8529 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-8529 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 02, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 616 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Merrill E. FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-8529. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 15, 1996. Decide
More

85 F.3d 616

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Merrill E. FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-8529.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 2, 1996.

Merrill E. Fields, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fields v. Smith, No. CA-95-2864-H (D.Md. Nov. 28, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer