Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Walter Lee Sadler, and Inmates of Mecklenburg County Jail Annex v. Jim Pendergrass, Sheriff Mecklenburg County Jails, 95-8564 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-8564 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 02, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 617 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter Lee SADLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Inmates of Mecklenburg County Jail Annex, Plaintiffs, v. Jim PENDERGRASS, Sheriff; Mecklenburg County Jails, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-8564. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth
More

85 F.3d 617

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter Lee SADLER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Inmates of Mecklenburg County Jail Annex, Plaintiffs,
v.
Jim PENDERGRASS, Sheriff; Mecklenburg County Jails,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-8564.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: May 2, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-443-3-MU).

Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sadler v. Pendergrass, No. CA-95-443-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer