Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

William Ray Deloach v. Warden Bass Regional Administrator Smith L.A. Brown, C/o Lieutenant Harrison, C/o, 95-8547 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-8547 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 92 F.3d 1177 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William Ray DELOACH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden BASS; Regional Administrator Smith; L.A. Brown, C/O; Lieutenant Harrison, C/O, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-8547. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted:
More

92 F.3d 1177

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Ray DELOACH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Warden BASS; Regional Administrator Smith; L.A. Brown,
C/O; Lieutenant Harrison, C/O, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-8547.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 25, 1996.
Decided: August 7, 1996.

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIUM:

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on November 8, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on December 14, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer