Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Joseph Riddick v. United States Department of Justice Us Government, Western District of Virginia United States of America, 96-6088 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6088 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 92 F.3d 1181 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; US Government, Western District of Virginia; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-6088. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Cir
More

92 F.3d 1181

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; US Government, Western
District of Virginia; United States of America,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 25, 1996.
Decided: August 7, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-8-R)

Joseph Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Because Appellant could have amended his complaint to assert some claim, the district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer