Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gregory M. Taylor v. Ronald Angelone, 96-6134 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6134 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 30, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 92 F.3d 1182 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gregory M. TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-6134. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 23, 1996. Decided July 30, 1996. Appeal from the United States Dist
More

92 F.3d 1182

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory M. TAYLOR, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Ronald ANGELONE, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 96-6134.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 30, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-430-AM).

Gregory M. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Angelone, No. CA-95-430-AM (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer