Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. John R. Ward, A/K/A Billy, 96-6376 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6376 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 05, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 92 F.3d 1184 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John R. WARD, a/k/a Billy, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-6376. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: Aug. 5, 1996 Appeal from the Unit
More

92 F.3d 1184

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
John R. WARD, a/k/a Billy, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 96-6376.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 23, 1996
Decided: Aug. 5, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-88-N)

John R. Ward, Appellant Pro Se.

Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West Supp.1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ward, No. CR-92-88-N (E.D.Va. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer