Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

96-6712 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6712 Visitors: 28
Filed: Oct. 24, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 99 F.3d 1130 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jesse James PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George ALLEN; Ed Murray; E.C. Morris; L.M. Saunders; Stu Taylor; Major Day; D. Boyers, Captain; Lieutenant Boyers; Captain Halloway; Lieutenant Lyles; Sergeant Sprouse; Guar
More

99 F.3d 1130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jesse James PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
George ALLEN; Ed Murray; E.C. Morris; L.M. Saunders; Stu
Taylor; Major Day; D. Boyers, Captain; Lieutenant Boyers;
Captain Halloway; Lieutenant Lyles; Sergeant Sprouse;
Guard Perry; Guard Silvea; Investigator Dury; Ronald
Angelone, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6712.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 24, 1996.

Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pritchard v. Allen, No. CA-95-319-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer