Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, A/K/A Herbert Lee Bailey v. Parker Evatt William R. Davis James R. Archie Milan O. Bradovich, 96-6447 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6447 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 24, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 99 F.3d 1130 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rastaman Mtume Obalaji MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert Lee Bailey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parker EVATT; William R. Davis; James R. Archie; Milan O. Bradovich, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-6447. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth
More

99 F.3d 1130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rastaman Mtume Obalaji MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert Lee Bailey,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT; William R. Davis; James R. Archie; Milan O.
Bradovich, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6447.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided: Oct. 24, 1996.

Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se.

William Paul Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mfume I v. Evatt, No. CA-94-3177-0-20BD (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer