Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

96-6357 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6357 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 99 F.3d 1133 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ervin WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donnie HILL, Jail Administrator, Chesterfield County Jail; Bernie Ballard; Ralph Freeman, Sheriff of Chesterfield County; Earl Campbell, Jailer, Chesterfield County Jail, Defendants-Appe
More

99 F.3d 1133

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ervin WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donnie HILL, Jail Administrator, Chesterfield County Jail;
Bernie Ballard; Ralph Freeman, Sheriff of
Chesterfield County; Earl Campbell,
Jailer, Chesterfield County
Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6357.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 23, 1996.

Ervin Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina; Bernie Ballard, Pageland, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wallace v. Hill, No. CA-93-2195-2-20AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 1994; Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer