Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Weathers v. William E. Gunn, Director of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, 96-6695 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6695 Visitors: 28
Filed: Oct. 24, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 99 F.3d 1133 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph WEATHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William E. GUNN, Director of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-6695. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17
More

99 F.3d 1133

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph WEATHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William E. GUNN, Director of the Department of Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6695.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 24, 1996.

Joseph Weathers, Appellant Pro Se.

Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Weathers v. Gunn, No. CA-95-2627-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer